Blog on... + Exam date

WHAT'S THIS BLOG FOR? Pointers on DCRUP/CRUD + MANGeR! For Q1a (looking at progression from As to A2) thats Digital technology; Creativity; Research + planning; Use of conventions from real media texts; Post-production. For Q1b (examining EITHER AS or A2 production) thats Media Language; Audience; Narrative; GenrE; Representation.

When's the 2018 (CIAE) exam? Monday 4th June, am.

Saturday, 23 September 2017

CREATIVITY Pop will eat itself

See what I did there...?
Probably not! My preferred reading intertextualised an 80s Indie band, PWEI, but the odds on my target audience being able to follow this are slim. The post is about the lack of originality in pop music, which constantly recycles existing songs. If you didn't get that then my encoded meaning has failed to even get a negotiated reading (Stuart Hall's theory)!

One of the big issues to tackle on the Creativity topic is authorship, or even auteurship. To what extent have you created a simulacra? How has your research influenced your work? Is intertextuality (or other postmodern characteristics - remember that the concept argues that ALL texts are basically remixing existing ideas, complete originality is impossible).

The article linked discusses the growing trend for artists (cough ... enemy of music Ed Sheeran is amongst those discussed) to recreate bits of past tunes ... without acknowledging they've done so.

The user comments underneath are useful btw; they flag up many more examples you probably weren't aware of. I agree wholeheartedly with the Gaga/Madonna comment, though Madge herself is a walking example of bricolage to a degree...

Blurred lines: why Taylor Swift and Ed Sheeran are paying homage to pop’s past https://www.theguardian.com/music/2017/sep/22/taylor-swift-ed-sheeran-pillaging-pops-past-right-said-fred?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Blogger

Saturday, 1 July 2017

Web 2.0 users graph FB alone 2bn monthly users

https://techcrunch.com/2017/06/27/facebook-2-billion-users/?utm_source=tcfbpage&sr_share=facebook

Wednesday, 24 May 2017

Q1B Genre to Audience links

tbc

Neale argued in his study of cinema genres that audiences bring with them expectations on genre codes and conventions, and that their interaction is central to the construction and definition of genre, an endlessly ongoing process. Katz and Blumler also argued that simply recognising common features is another source of audience pleasure, and motivation to view (and, crucially for the music video, repeatedly re-view) a video. Neale also noted the importance to audiences of "differences in repetition", while Abercrombie noted that audiences gain pleasure from observing manipulations of standard genre conventions. In our video we took the convention of [EX; seen with eg/s of videos] and gave it a distinctly different slant by [EX].

There are other ways in which we can see how Blumler and Katz's work helps illuminate the interplay between audience and producers when it comes to genre. Their best known concept, the uses and gratifications theory, sets out key motivations for audiences to select the media they consume, and its clear that genre encoding is crucial in the context of music video. Identification, one of their 5 categories, was a core consideration in constructing our video, and clearly for professional producers too. [The EX is distinct depending on the genre: rock = everyday, relatable clothing [detail!], low key lighting, de-emphasising glamour while pop/dance is typically the opposite BUT may mix it up to strengthen the brand and audience appeal. This concept can also be applied to your NARRATIVE! Some videos directly represent fans within a video - you all have viral elements you can tie in]. This can also be at the aspirational level, and [EX: instrumental ability for rock, dancing for pop/dance, but also costume...]

My genre is known for featuring what Altman refers to as [emotional/visceral pleasures or intellectual puzzles], which can be seen in the [existing vid EX]. In mine, we [EX]

Costume is a defining feature of genre conventions in music video, and we noted the following as typical, further backed up by our own audience primary research [you can BRIEFLY detail if you want to]. Hebdige placed distinctive costume at the heart of his concept of subculture, and that clearly applies here. Much of our own costume/make-up work [EX] would be recognised within the broader genre of ..., but we did incorporate specific signifiers of this sub-culture [EX]

Genre, as we've seen, is a crucial concept for commercially exploiting music and for artists to attract an audience, but the concept can prove very loose when examined closely. The postmodernist Baudrillard put it typically colourfully when describing genre as [use all or any 1 part of his quote: 'a principal of contamination, a law of impurity, a parasitical economy']. Katie Wales put it even more bluntly when arguing that 'genre is an intertextual concept'. I found many examples of [genre] videos that reflected this [EX], borrowing from film, Tv and wider culture as well as from within and beyond this music video genre. In ours, we encoded intertextual references to [EX]. This was one means of avoiding simply being what Negus describes as a 'generecist, rather taking a pastichist approach. As we don't expect every viewer to recognise these references, there also what Rick Altman, in discussing pleasures that audiences gain from genres, describes as 'intellectual puzzles'. Bourdieu, whose work fits well with Hebdige's subculture concept, would recognise the 'cultural capital' on offer to those who can correctly identify the influences from our work.

Wednesday, 22 March 2017

Web 2.0

There is another very long post here worth checking out; in time I'll update everything here, but for now here's a summative overview (with a nod to Chris Creber, who I've adapted some of this from).

There's much more on this blog: web 2.0 tag ... and the musividz blog has even more again (tag link) - on the right there's a screenshot from March 2017 of recent posts linked to the topic:






...

Wednesday, 18 January 2017

Mulvey's male gaze - Guns'n Roses Avicii Miley Cyrus

Lets take a fresh look at the male gaze...

To help refresh our semiotic skills, and as a very practical help for the Y11s, we looked at and wrote in feedback on several rough cuts of Y11 music videos, viewable from the playlist below (you can also comment directly on YT and I can pass this on). I'm awaiting updated cuts at the time of writing.



Along the way, we discussed Stuart Hall's argument, plus the male gaze theory and how to formally discuss this - avoiding the trap of writing 'I applied the male gaze theory...' - by looking at two commercial examples:

1: GUNS'N ROSES' Welcome to the Jungle (1987) [video wiki]


With this video we broke down the media language behind the apparent sexism: our protagonist is clearly signified by following him and his gaze, even if the typical rule of thirds is conspicuously NOT applied in the opening shots (the huge space in the left 2/3 of the frame connoting his alienation from this 'jungle' - although he does begin more centrally framed within this fairly long take). His outsider status is neatly anchored not just by emerging from a Greyhound bus, but also by the simple, subtle small detail in the mise-en-scene of him chewing a straw - the hick stereotype!

He is given agency through cutting from extreme long shot with that uncomfortable framing to a more centrally framed medium close-up/medium tracking shot, and the very literal male gaze when we cut from his leering look at the passing woman's legs and behind to a point-of-view shot positioning the audience to empathise with him. The woman is not a full character, or person, simply legs and bum wrapped in a short, tight skirt with high heels; she is thus objectified.